1. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45–64.
  2. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:87-101.
  3. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, et al. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012;28:72–86.
  4. Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, et al. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent 2006;34:427-35.
  5. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97–101.
  6. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311–7.
  7. Bhuva B, Giovarruscio M, Rahim N, et al. The restoration of root filled teeth: a review of the clinical literature. Int Endod J. 2021;54:509-535. 
  8. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, et al. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration.  J  Pros Dent 2002;88: 297–301.
  9. Sauro S, Pashley HD. Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches – State of The Art. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016; 69: 39-57
  10. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1–16.
  11. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215–35.
  12. Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a Comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:219–41.
  13. Chen H, Feng S, Jin Y, et al. Comparison of bond strength of universal adhesives using different etching modes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater J. 2021. 
  14. Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a Comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:219–41
  15. Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, et al. Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer – A review. Dent Mater 2013;29:999–1011.
  16. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1–16.
  17. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing–a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003;16:6–12.
  18. Sauro S, Watson TF, Mannocci F, et al. Two-photon laser confocal microscopy of micropermeability of resin-dentin bonds made with water or ethanol wet bonding. J Biomed Mater Res :Appl Biomater 2009;90:327–37.
  19. Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M, et al. Influence of the hydrostatic pulpal pressure on droplets formation in current etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a video rate/TSM microscopy and fluid filtration study. Dent Mater 2009;25:1392–402.
  20. Park JG, Ye Q, Topp EM, et al. Preparation and properties of novel dentin adhesives with esterase resistance. J Appl Polym Sci 2008;107:3588–97.
  21. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118–32.
  22. Mazzoni A, Mannello F, Tay FR, et al. Zymographic analysis and characterization of MMP-2 and -9 forms in human sound dentin. J Dent Res 2007;86:436–40.
  23. Sulkala M, Wahlgren J, Larmas M, et al. The effects of MMP inhibitors on human salivary MMP activity and caries progression in rats. J Dent Res 2001;80:1545–9.
  24. Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Wadgaonkar B, et al. Activation of gelatinolytic/collagenolytic activity in dentin by self-etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2006;114:160–6.
  25. Hashimoto M. A Review – A review–micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin-dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2010;92:268–80.
  26. Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Martini AP, et al. Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin-adhesive interfaces. Dent Mater 2015;31:141–53.
  27. Schulze KA, Oliveira SA, Wilson RS, et al. Effect of hydration variability on hybrid layer properties of a self-etching versus an acid-etching system. Biomaterials 2005;26:1011–8.
  28. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376–81.
  29. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118–32.
  30. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17–28.
  31. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Dent Res 1998;77:1749–59.
  32. Hegde NN, Attavar SH, Hegde MN, Priya G. Antibacterial activity of dental restorative material: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21:42-46. 
  33. Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro. Caries Res 2002;36:101-7. 
  34. Pires PM, Neves AA, Makeeva IM, et al. Contemporary restorative ion-releasing materials: current status, interfacial properties and operative approaches. Br Dent J. 2020;229:450-458. 
  35. Wilson AD. Glass-ionomer cement–origins, development and future. Clin Mater 1991;7:275–82.
  36. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. Four-year water degradation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:73–83.
  37. Hoshika S, De Munck J, Sano H, et al. Effect of conditioning and aging on the bond trength and interfacial morphology of glassionomer cement bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2015;17:141–6.
  38. Hoshika S, Ting S, Ahmed Z, et al. Effect of conditioning and 1 year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin. Dent Mater 2021;37:106-112. 
  39. Sato T, Takagaki T, Ikeda M, et al. Effects of Selective Phosphoric Acid Etching on Enamel Using "No-wait" Self-etching Adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20:407-415. 
  40. van de Sande FH, Rodolpho PA, Basso GR, et al. 18-year survival of posterior composite resin restorations with and without glass ionomer cement as base. Dent Mater 2015;31:669-75.
  41. Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: Two-year results. Oper Dent 2010; 35: 397–404. 
  42. Ferracane JL. Resin composite–state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29–38. 
  43. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, et al. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2007: 23: 272–278.
  44. Boaro LC, Froes-Salgado NR, Gajewski VE, et al. Correlation between polymerization stress and interfacial integrity of composites restorations assessed by different in vitro tests. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 984–992. 
  45. Van Dijken JW, Lindberg A. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite. Dent. Mater 2015; 31:1150–1158. 
  46. He Z, Shimada Y, Sadr A, et al. The effects of cavity size and filling method on the bonding to Class I cavities. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 447–453. 
  47. Sakaguchi RL, Peters MC, Nelson SR, et al. Effects of polymerization contraction in composite restorations. J Dent 1992; 20: 178–182.
  48. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396–1399. 
  49. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 999–1007. 
  50. Fleming GJ, Cara RR, Palin WM, Burke FJ Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based filling materials cured using a ‘soft-start’ polymerisation protocol. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 637–643. 
  51. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775–783. 
  52. He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in Class I cavities. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 533–538.
  53. Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, et al. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 579–585.
  54. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 873–880. 
  55. Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC, Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: Effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 203–210. 
  56. Sampaio PC, de Almeida Junior AA, Francisconi LF, et al. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 403–412. 
  57. Sauro S, Faus-Matoses V, Makeeva I, et al. Effects of Polyacrylic Acid Pre-Treatment on Bonded-Dentine Interfaces Created with a Modern Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Subjected to Cycling Mechanical Stress. Materials 2018; 11: 1884. 
  58. Toledano M, Cabello I, Aguilera FS, et al. Effect of in vitro chewing and bruxism events on remineralization, at the resin-dentin interface. J Biomech 2015; 48: 14–21.
  59. Khvostenko D, Salehi S, Naleway SE, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mitchell JC, Kruzic JJ. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps. Dent Mater 2015, 31, 702–710.
  60. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17-24. .
  61. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8. 
  62. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 1986;65:1319-21. 
  63. Umer F, Khan FR. Postoperative sensitivity in Class V composite restorations: comparing soft start vs. constant curing modes of LED. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:76-9.
  64. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28:135-44. .
  65. Son SA, Park JK, Seo DG, et al. How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites? Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:559-65. 
  66. Fronza BM, Ayres A, Pacheco RR, Rueggeberg FA, Dias C, Giannini M. Characterization of Inorganic Filler Content, Mechanical Properties, and Light Transmission of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent 2017;42:445-55. 
  67. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, et al. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 2008;24:901-7. 
  68. Banerjee A. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 7. Minimally invasive operative caries management: rationale and techniques. Br Dent J 2013;214:107–11
  69. Black RB. Airbrasive: some fundamentals. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41:701–10,
  70. Hegde VS, Khatavkar RA. A new dimension to conservative dentistry: air abrasion. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:4–8, 
  71. McComb D. Systematic review of conservative operativecaries management strategies. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1154–61.
  72. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. CariesRes 2000;34:144–50,
  73. Cook RJ, Azzopardi A, Thompson ID, Watson TF. Real-time confocal imaging, during active air abrasion — substratecutting. J Microsc 2001;203:199–207,
  74. Rafique S, Fiske J, Banerjee A. Clinical trial of anair-abrasion/chemomechanical operative procedure for therestorative treatment of dental patients. Caries Res 2003;37:360–4, 
  75. Tan MH, Hill RG, Anderson P. Comparing the air abrasioncutting efficacy of dentine using a fluoride-containingbioactive glass versus an alumina abrasive: an in vitro study. Int J Dent 2015; 2015: 521901,
  76. Spagnuolo G, Pires PM, Calarco A, et al. An in-vitro study investigating the effect of air-abrasion bioactive glasses on dental adhesion, cytotoxicity and odontogenic gene expression. Dent Mater 2021;37:1734-1750.
  77. Wong FS, Willmott NS, Davis GR. Dentinal carious lesion inthree dimensions. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:419–23
  78. Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N. Shrinkage stresses generated during resin-composite applications: a review. J Dent Biomech 2010;2010:131630
  79. Johnson EW, Castaldi CR, Gau DJ, Wysocki GP. Stress pattern variations in operatively prepared human teeth, studied by three-dimensional photoelasticity. J Dent Res1968;47:548–58,  
  80. Ayad MF, Maghrabi AA, Saif RE, García-Godoy F. Influence of tooth preparation burs on the roughness and bond strengthof adhesives to human dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 2011;24:176–82.
  81. Sauro S, Watson TF, Thompson I, et al. Influence of air-abrasion executed withpolyacrylic acid-Bioglass 45S5 on the bonding performanceof a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:168–77.
  82. Sauro S, Watson TF, Thompson I, Banerjee A. One-bottleself-etching adhesives applied to dentine air-abraded usingbioactive glasses containing polyacrylic acid: an in vitromicrotensile bond strength and confocal microscopy study. J Dent 2012;40:896–905.
  83. ishimura K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect ofair-powder polishing on dentin adhesion of a self-etchingprimer bonding system. Dent Mater J 2005;24:59–65.
  84. Zhong JP, LaTorre GP, Hench LL. The kinetics of bioactiveceramics. Part VII: binding of collagen to hydroxyapatite andbioactive glass. In: Andersson ÖH, Yli-Urpo A, editors.Bioceramics, Vol. 7. 1994. p. 61–6.
  85. Hench LL, Paschall HA. Direct chemical bond of bioactiveglass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle. J Biomed MaterRes 1973;7:25–42.
  86. Efflandt SE, Magne P, Douglas WH, Francis LF. Interactionbetween bioactive glasses and human dentin. J Mater SciMater Med 2002;13:557–65.
  87. Osorio R, Yamauti M, Sauro S, et al. Experimental resin cements containing bioactive fillersreduce matrix metalloproteinase-mediated dentin collagendegradation. J Endod 2012;38:1227–32.
  88. Osorio R, Yamauti M, Sauro S, et. Zinc incorporation improves biological activity of beta-tricalciumsilicate resin-based cement. J Endod 2014;40:1840–5.
  89. Gubler M, Brunner TJ, Zehnder M, et al. Do bioactive glasses convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH? Int Endod J 2008;41:670–678. 
  90. Allan I, Newman H, Wilson M. Antibacterial activity of particulate bioglass against supra- and subgingival bacteria. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1683–1687.
  91. Khvostenko D, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, et al. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2016;32:73-81.
  92. Kidd E, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1996;75:1942–1946. 
  93. Choi K, Condon J, Ferracane J. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000;79:812–817
  94. Pongprueksa P, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength. Oper dent 2007;32:466–475. 
  95. Vandewalle KS, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Erickson RL, Sakaguchi RL. Effect of energy density on properties and marginal integrity of posterior resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2004;20:96–106.
  96. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Pros 2004; 17, 369–76.
  97. Brito-Junior M, Pereira RD, Verıssimo C et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution of simulated immature teeth after apexification with mineral trioxide aggregate. Int End J 2014; 47: 958–66.
  98. Nikhil V, Jha P, Aggarwal A. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with glass fibre posts, intracanal composite resin, and experimental dentine posts. The Scientific World Journal. 2015; 751425.
  99. Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of fibre post length and adhesive strategy on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent 2012; 40, 312–21.
  100. 100.Borelli B, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M. Effect of the length of glass fibre posts on the fracture resistance of restored maxillary central incisors. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 79–83. 
  101. 101.Naumann M, Neuhaus KW, Kolpin M, Seemann R. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany. Clin Oral Invest 2016; 20: 253–9.
  102. 102.Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 2009; 35: 1477–82.
  103. 103.Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Up to 17-year controlled clinical study on postand-cores and covering crowns. J Dent 2007; 35:778–86.
  104. 104.Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creamers NH. Composite resin core-crown reconstructions: an up to 17-year follow-up of a controlled clinical trial. Int J Pros 2008; 21: 109–15.
  105. 105.Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, et al.  Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fibre posts and resin composite: five-year results. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 9–15.
  106. 106.Ellner S, Bergendal T, Bergman B. Four post-and-core combinations as abutments for fixed single crowns: a prospective up to 10-year study. Int J Pros 2003; 16: 249–54.
  107. 107.Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fibre composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a 5-year follow-up study. Int J Pros 2017; 30: 71–9.
  108. 108.Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007; 33: 391–8.
  109. 109.Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fibre posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod 2013;201339: 11–5.
  110. 110.Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Dietrich T, et al. Dentin-like versus rigid endodontic post: 11-year randomized controlled pilot trial on no-wall to 2-wall defects. . J Endod 2017; 43: 1770–5.
  111. 111.Figueiredo FE, Martins-Filho PR, Faria ESAL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fibre post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. . J Endod 2015; 41: 309–16.
  112. 112.Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fibre posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014; 39: E31–44.
  113. 113.Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K, Raab WH. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 364–8.
  114. 114.Ikram OH, Patel S, Sauro S, Mannocci F. Micro-computed tomography of tooth tissue volume changes following endodontic procedures and post space preparation. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 1071–6.
  115. 115.Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. Journal of Dental Research 2012; 91: S72–8.
  116. 116.Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosth 2010; 19: 639–46.
  117. 117.Mjor IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M, Mannocci F. The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int End J 2001; 34, 346–53.
  118. 118.Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005; 31: 584–9.
  119. 119.Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Light transmitting ability of marketed fibre posts. J Dent Res 2008; 87, 1122–6.
  120. 120.Daneshpoor N, Pishevar L. Comparative evaluation of bioactive cements on biomimetic remineralisation of dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12:e291-e299. 
  121. 121.Owens B. Bioactivity, Biocompatibility and Biomimetic Properties for Dental Materials: Clarifying the Confusion? Modern Approaches in Dentistry and Oral Health Care. 2018 (2).  
  122. 122.Bergoli CD, Brondani LP, Wandscher VF et al. A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial of fibre post cementation strategies. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 128–35.
  123. 123.Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Dorigo ED, Ferrari M. Adhesion to intraradicular dentin: a review. J  Adhes Sci Tech 2009; 23, 1053–83.
  124. 124.Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fibre posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005, 627–35.
  125. 125.Soares AP, Bitter K, Lagrange A, et al. Gaps at the interface between dentine and self-adhesive resin cement in post-endodontic restorations quantified in 3D by phase contrast-enhanced micro-CT. Int Endod J 2020; 53: 392–402.
  126. 126.Gu XH, Mao CY, Liang C, Wang HM, Kern M. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness? Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 597–603.
  127. 127.Bitter K, Hambarayan A, Neumann K, et al. Various irrigation protocols for final rinse to improve bond strengths of fibre posts inside the root canal. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121: 349–54.
  128. 128.Cecchin D, de Almeida JF, Gomes BP, et al. Influence of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the bond strength and durability of the adhesion of the fibre posts to root dentin using a total etching adhesive system. J Endod; 2011; 37: 1310–5.
  129. 129.Cecchin D, Giacomin M, Farina AP, et al. Effect of chlorhexidine and ethanol on push-out bond strength of fibre posts under cyclic loading. J Adh Dent 2014; 16: 87–92.
  130. 130.Bitter K, Aschendorff L, Neumann K, et al. Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fibre posts inside the root canal? Clin Oral Inv 2014; 18: 927–34.