Fig. 1

Case History

A 42-year-old male patient was referred with persistent pain and discomfort associated with the mandibular left first molar (tooth 36). The patient reported a history of previous endodontic intervention, following which the symptoms had failed to resolve. Clinical examination revealed tenderness to percussion along with discomfort during mastication, suggestive of ongoing periapical pathology.

Radiographic assessment demonstrated an inadequately treated root canal system, accompanied by a radiolucency in the furcation region. These findings raised a strong suspicion of a procedural complication, most likely a perforation (Fig. 1).

Access refinement was performed under rubber dam (Fig 2) and dental operating microscope to allow enhanced visualisation. Upon careful inspection, a pulpal floor perforation was clearly identified in the furcation area, adjacent to the distal canal (Fig. 3). The defect exhibited active bleeding and a direct communication with the periodontal tissues, confirming its biological significance and potential impact on prognosis.

Further evaluation of the canal system revealed incomplete debridement, with evidence of insufficient canal preparation and the presence of residual intracanal medicament (Fig. 3). These findings indicated suboptimal prior treatment and contributed to the persistence of symptoms.

Based on the clinical and radiographic findings, a diagnosis of previously initiated therapy with an iatrogenic pulpal floor perforation and associated apical periodontitis was established. In line with contemporary minimally invasive principles, the treatment plan focused on targeted repair of the perforation, followed by completion of root canal therapy to achieve biological and functional resolution.

Fig. 2

Phase wise Treatment provided

Phase 1: Pre-operative Preparation

  • Administer local anaesthesia to ensure profound analgesia.
  • Achieve strict rubber dam isolation to maintain an aseptic field. (Fig 2)
  • Assess preoperative radiographs and confirm working strategy under magnification.

Phase 2: Access Refinement and Identification of Perforation

  • Refine the existing access cavity to improve visibility and straight-line access.
  • Perform all procedures under a dental operating microscope.
  • Carefully debride the pulp chamber to remove debris and remnants of previous treatment.
  • Identify the perforation site on the pulpal floor (typically in the furcation region). (Fig 3)

Phase 3: Haemostasis and Site Decontamination

  • Irrigate gently using diluted sodium hypochlorite with a 27-gauge side-vented needle.
  • Avoid directing irrigant toward the perforation to prevent extrusion into periodontal tissues.
  • Achieve haemostasis using sterile paper points (video 1).
  • Ensure a clean and relatively dry field prior to material placement.(Fig 4)

Phase 4: Placement of Repair Material (MTA)

  • Prepare mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to a putty-like consistency.
  • Deliver MTA precisely to the perforation site using the appropriate system (video 2).
  • Place the material incrementally under magnification.
  • Gently compact using micro-pluggers to ensure intimate adaptation to dentinal walls.
  • Avoid overfilling or extrusion beyond the defect.
  • Verify complete sealing of the perforation visually.
Fig. 3

Phase wise Treatment provided

Phase 5: Setting and Interim Seal

  • Place a moist microbrush/cotton pellet over the MTA to facilitate setting.
  • Temporarily seal the access cavity.
  • Evaluation of MTA set (Fig 5).

Phase 6: Retreatment – Canal Negotiation and Cleaning

  • Remove intracanal medicament using rotary files.
  • Establish canal patency.
  • Determine working length using an electronic apex locator, confirmed radiographically.
  • Perform cleaning and shaping using a crown-down rotary technique.
  • Preserve original canal anatomy while ensuring adequate enlargement.
  • Irrigate with 3% sodium hypochlorite using side-vented needles throughout instrumentation.
  • Ensure effective irrigant penetration without apical extrusion.
Fig. 4

Phase 7: Obturation

  • Select appropriate master cone (matching final preparation size).
  • Apply bioceramic sealer within the canal (video 3).
  • Perform obturation using the single-cone technique (video 3).
  • Ensure homogenous fill and adaptation to canal walls.
  • Verify obturation radiographically (Fig 7).

Phase 8: Restorative and Follow-Up

  • Place SDR flowable composite incrementally for core build-up.
  • Review clinically for resolution of symptoms.
  • Radiographic evaluation to assess healing of the furcation area.
Fig. 5

Clinical picture showing pulpal floor perforation repaired with MTA.

Fig. 6

Clinical picture showing pulpal floor perforation repaired with MTA and canals obturated.

sterile paper point to stop bleeding

Use of appropriate system to place MTA

3D obturation with Bioceramic sealer and GP

Fig. 7

Radiographic verification of the obturation

Conclusions

The management of iatrogenic perforations has undergone a substantial transformation in contemporary endodontic practice. Clinical situations that were previously associated with uncertain outcomes can now be addressed with a high degree of predictability through a combination of improved diagnostic capabilities and biologically sound treatment strategies.

Successful outcomes are largely dependent on timely recognition of the defect, accurate identification of its location, and meticulous control of the local environment to prevent further contamination. The use of bioactive materials, particularly mineral trioxide aggregate, has played a pivotal role in enhancing repair by providing an effective seal while supporting tissue healing.

Advances in visualisation, especially the routine use of magnification, together with adjunctive imaging such as CBCT when indicated, have significantly improved the clinician’s ability to manage such complications with precision. In addition, modern rotary instrumentation systems enable effective retreatment while maintaining the structural integrity of the tooth. These factors, combined with thorough irrigation protocols and a reliable coronal seal, are essential for achieving long-term success.

This case reinforces the value of a focused and conservative treatment philosophy, where intervention is directed specifically at the underlying cause rather than relying on extensive or unnecessarily invasive procedures. Such an approach not only preserves remaining tooth structure but also enhances the overall prognosis.

In essence, predictable management of perforations is achieved through the thoughtful integration of accurate diagnosis, appropriate material selection, and precise clinical execution. This holistic approach remains fundamental to delivering successful outcomes in complex endodontic cases.

Bibliography

  1. Seltzer S, Sinai I, August D. Periodontal effects of root perforations before and during endodontic procedures. J Dent Res. 1970;49(2):332–339.
  2. Fuss Z, Trope M. Root perforations: classification and treatment choices. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12(6):255–264.
  3. Tsesis I, Fuss Z. Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root perforations. Endod Topics. 2006;13(1):95–107.
  4. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root-end filling material. J Endod. 1993;19(12):591–595.
  5. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010;36(1):16–27.