Fig. 1

The periapical X-ray highlights the complexity of the case, showing a chronic periapical abscess likely caused by either iatrogenic necrosis or trauma related to the use of orthodontic appliances.

Access:

Performed using a long-shank bur and ultrasonic tips.

Shaping:

Carried out with Flash Glider 13.04 and Flash 25.06 files.

Irrigation:

Conducted with 8% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA, activated with EDDY.

Obturation:

Done using Bio-C Repair (putty) for the apical seal, followed by backfill with warm gutta-percha.

Key Principle:

Simplifying each step is the key.

Conclusions

In this video, you can see each step in detail to complete the treatment of a dens invaginatus case in a single session. Case planning is the most critical phase, as it enables us to assess and define the most effective and predictable strategy. An equally important step is explaining the condition and treatment plan in detail to the patient, since their understanding and collaboration are essential—especially in complex anatomical situations.

The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) played a fundamental role by providing a three-dimensional understanding of the invagination and root canal morphology, allowing for more accurate diagnosis and case planning, as well as clearer communication with the patient.

An essential part of the treatment protocol is the use of bioceramic materials, especially in cases involving complex anatomy, thin dentinal walls, or communication with the periodontal ligament space (Oehlers Type II and III). Bioceramics offer superior sealing ability, excellent biocompatibility, and the potential to promote periapical healing. Their bioactivity and dimensional stability make them ideal for obturation and apical sealing in invaginated canals or irregular spaces that cannot be predictably managed with conventional materials.

During the follow-up, clinical evaluation is always combined with periapical radiography and, when indicated, CBCT imaging to confirm long-term healing and the absence of pathology.

Bibliography

1. Oehlers, F. A. C. (1957). Dens invaginatus (dilated composite odontome). I. Variations of the invagination process and associated anterior crown forms. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 10(11), 1204–1218.

2.Hülsmann, M. (1997). Dens invaginatus: Aetiology, classification, prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment considerations. International Endodontic Journal, 30(2), 79–90.

3.Alani, A., & Bishop, K. (2008). Dens invaginatus. Part 1: Classification, prevalence and aetiology. International Endodontic Journal, 41(12), 1123–1136.

4.Alani, A., & Bishop, K. (2008). Dens invaginatus. Part 2: Clinical, radiographic features and management options.International Endodontic Journal, 41(12), 1137–1154.